| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6045 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Golla Rajanna Etc. vs Divisional Manager and Anr., Etc.
Workmen's Compensation Act 1923: Reduction of compensation-Finding of commissioner purely a question of fact, Reappreciation of evidence by high court not proper-
Whether the high court was justified in reducing the compensation awarded to the appellants. Held, the workmen's compensation commissioner, havi [LexDoc Id : 505880]
|
SC |
2016 |
CIT vs Super Malls (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506280]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Prahalada Varada Gururaj Itigi vs Vishveshwaraiah Technological University Jnan Sangama and Ors.
Grace marks-Applicability of rules-Petitioner got admitted to Bachelor of Engineering Course in second respondent-College and opted Electronics and Communication Branch in academic year [LexDoc Id : 506279]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
CIT vs Model Public School
Registration of society-Section 12AA(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Utilization of surplus funds.-CIT (A) has granted all benefits available under Section 12AA(3) to assesse/appellant. Whether, under the facts and in the circumstances of the case a [LexDoc Id : 506275]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority CIT
Re-opening of assessment-Section 32, Section 43 and Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Depreciation.-Whether on facts and in the circumstances, Tribunal was justified in holding that there was justifiable material/reasons to issue notice under Section [LexDoc Id : 506272]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd. vs DCIT
Disallowance-Section 8D( c ) & 14A (2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Adduce reasons.-AO made disallowance in accord with Rule 8D(c) of Act. Whether, in facts and circumstances of case AO was justified in made disallowance as per Sectio [LexDoc Id : 506613]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Navkar Share and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Validity of Notice-Section 147 and Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-Notice for reopening of assessment was issued to petitioner. Whether, impugned notice of reopening of assessment was justified or liable to set aside. [LexDoc Id : 506278]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Kala Niketan and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of Notice-Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-Notice under Section 148 of Act seeking to reopen assessment of Petitioner's partnership firm for assessment year 1990-91. Whether, re-opening notice [LexDoc Id : 506274]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd. vs DCIT
Disallowance-Section 8D and Section 14A(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Methodology.-AO made disallowance claimed by assesse/appellant. Whether, AO was justified in disallowing assesse/appellant. Held, language of Section 14A presuppos [LexDoc Id : 506273]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
D.P. Corgo Movers (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505822]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. vs All Uttar Pradesh Consumer Protection Bar Association
Recommendation-Section 24B of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. State government.-Committee was permitted to forward its recommendations to each state government concerned for appropriate steps in time bound manner. Whether, recomme [LexDoc Id : 505460]
|
SC |
2016 |
Aura Synergy India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs New Age False Ceiling Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506227]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal and Ors. vs Kishore Wadhwani and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505959]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Vaibhav Global Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 505827]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
J.K. Synthetics Mazdoor Union (Citu) and Ors., Rajasthan Trade Union Kendra and Anr. and J.K. Synthetics Ltd. vs ARFAT Petrochemicals (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Sick Industrial Company-Section 22A of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Validity of directions.-BIFR passed order of status quo and directing First Respondent not to alienate/transfer assets. High Court held that BIFR does not have competence to [LexDoc Id : 505461]
|
SC |
2016 |
M. Palaniappan and Ors. vs Nachimuthu
Specific performance-Sale agreement-Whether, suit sale agreement has been validly executed, if so, whether it is enforceable in law especially when plaintiff has not proved his readiness [LexDoc Id : 506424]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Bajoria Appliances (P) Ltd. vs Kinova Home Appliances (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505953]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Megatrends Inc. vs ACIT and Ors.
Validity of Notice-Section148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Re-opening of assessment.-Petitioner sought quashing of notice issued by first respondent under Section148 of Act for reopening of assessment. Whether, relief sought by petitio [LexDoc Id : 505786]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Druzba Overseas (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 505663]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
CIT vs Nav Sansar Agro Products
[LexDoc Id : 506277]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Shriram EPC Ltd. vs Soma Enterprises Ltd.
Liability to pay damages-Nominal damages-Whether, defendant is liable to pay damages, it has been decided that that defendant must be restrained by an order of injunction from infringing plai [LexDoc Id : 505961]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
G. Raju vs V. Saraswathi Ammal
Specific performance of contract-Terms of agreement-Suit for specific performance filed by respondent was allowed by Trial Court and same has been confirmed by first Appellate Court. Whether, Courts bel [LexDoc Id : 505839]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Balaji Infraro India Ltd. vs Chanakya National Law University and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505820]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Amarjeert Singh Rainu vs ITO
Validity of Notice-Section 143(3) and Section 144 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Serving of notice.-Whether, CIT(A) erred in not appreciating fact that notice under Section 143(2) of Act was never served upon assessee and even neither assessee appear [LexDoc Id : 505561]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Hussain Babulal Shaikh and Ors.
Tax deducted at source-Section 56 and Section 145A of Ijncome Tax Act, 1961. Warrant of attachment.-Application of respondent No.1 for issuance of warrant of attachment against petitioner in execution of an award, for not depositing part of award amo [LexDoc Id : 506281]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
